Ah, that old philosophical
conundrum –
do birds fly because they have
hollow bones,
or do they have hollow bones
because they fly?
On such matters, ask a
biologist
seems a better bet than ask
a philosopher.
I don’t know what the details
of their answer
would be, but somewhere in the
unfamiliar
landscape of scientific terms
which they employ,
you’d see the word evolution
stretched across the sky,
the clouds, the tops of trees
and hills and mountains.
Just recently, as I was
walking at the edge
of yet another field on my morning
stroll,
I saw the local crow collective
scattered
around the brown, uneven
surface of the land.
There were so many of them
that I paused
my walk. I stood and watched
them as they went
about their birdy morning ritual:
take-off, ascension, glide and
swoop
and swoop and glide, descend
and land,
all taking turns according to the crow flight roster
which they had spent the previous
night working out.
And as I watched their
mesmerising movements,
I heard them laugh at all the
world’s
philosophers and scientists,
whose ignorance of why birds
fly
amused them greatly.
‘We fly,’ their whole demeanour
said,
not because of any bone-related
sophistry.
We fly because we want to.’
And all of this has left me
wondering:
do so-called poets write
because they have
a pencil and a notebook
stuffed with paper,
or do they have a pencil and a
notebook
because they write?
It doesn’t matter. None of us
can fly
like birds, and very few, if
any, of our poems
will swoop or glide, but
sometimes when
we’re lucky, one or two might land.
No comments:
Post a Comment